The Winds of Change
From the purple finguered popular defiance in Iraq to the Cedar
Revolution in Lebanon, it is clear the Middle East stands at a cross roads;
could it be the daw of a new era, or just another desert mirage? There is much
international optimism that the first tentative steps along the path
towards real democracy may have already been taken.
By Adel
Darwish
A ripple of change is running through the Middle East, said Prime Minister Tony
Blair at the closing of his London international meeting in support of the
Palestinian Authority.
`` There is a genuine ....ripple of change at the moment,'' said Mr Blair,`` but
it is happening throughout the Middle East, and it is important that we
encourage it because it is out of there that so many of the issues that we
grapple with in the international community arise.''
Was Mr Blair trying to avoid accusations of plagiarising Harold Macmillan's
famous phrase ` the Winds of Change' heralding the end of colonialism in Africa,
in 1959 in South Africa?
It took the Afrikannas three decades to catch up, as their releasing of Nelson
Mandella and dismantling of apartheid coincided with the velvet revolution that
swept Europe in 1989; but it took the Middle East another 15 years before the
gentle breeze were felt.
Few would disagree that it was President George Bush's hand that dropped pebble
in the stagnant pond of the Middle East.
For the Cassandras who have declared the war an irretrievable catastrophe, the
Wilsonian belief that democracy would take root in Iraq and spread through the
region was no longer a fanciful illusion.
From the `purple finger revolution' in Iraq when near nine million voters qued
in polling stations defiance of terrorists' threat, to the Cedar revolution in
Lebanon, the change is sweeping through the Middle East, one of the last regions
in the world to cling to repressive governments, there is a whiff of 1989
people's revolution that fell the Berlin Wall.
`` As a new dawn of freedom rises on East Europe, '' I wrote in one of Fleet
Street papers at the time, `` The Arab world is sleep-walking into a
disaster....''; seven month later Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. His action was
applauded by many, including the late Palestinian president Yasser Arafat, who
was leading his nation in a crusade for ` self determination,' but was happy to
deny the same right to the Kuwaitis and the Kurds.
Sadly, the Middle East region barricaded itself against the winds of change by
locking a chastity belt around its intellectual and political organs. Democracy
was never conceived despite many futile attempts leading democracy ` doctors' to
believe the region was infertile.
Infertility is treated, in regional folklore by a` sudden scare,' like throwing
fresh blood on a woman's abdomen, or locking her in a tomb during a moonless
night. The war which removed Saddam, who once showed his security chiefs the
video of the 1989 fall of Nikolai Chauchescu to avoid a similar fate; provided a
` sudden scare' for the ripple of change to breech the chastity belt, with first
signs of life from the embryo of democracy .
In eight weeks, free presidential elections with multi choice, were held in
Palestine - and Palestine's new President Mahmoud Abbas condemned suicide
bombing against civilian as ` terrorism'-; and parliamentarian elections, the
first in half a century, in Iraq; a peaceful, yellow placards of ` enough'
movement lead to change in Egypt, and the Cedar Revolution, is sweeping through
Lebanon, although the jury are still out since Hizbullah organised a much larger
demonstration, that contradicted some of the `cedar demands'.
The second half of February witnessed thousands of Lebanese chanting for
freedom, amid all the paraphernalia remembered from Europe in 1989: guttering
candles; beautiful long-haired female students with democratic logos lipsticked
to foreheads; hastily mass-produced flags; strumming of guitars and the endless
felt-tip scrawling of slogans on T-shirts and walls. It certainly has the
choreography of revolution right, including a martyr - in the form of Rafik
Hariri, whose assassination on St Valentine Day, triggered the current intifadah
with its unifying demand of independence, just like the 1919 revolution in
Egypt, which, then, united the nation's ethnic, and religious factions. Within
30 months, the Egypt broke away from Ottoman empire as an independent kingdom
with its 1923 constitution giving women equal rights among many other civil
rights, many of which were reversed by the officers take over of 1952.
The 2005 Middle East is witnessing the dawn of people inspired true revolutions,
not military coups that usurped power by some murderers colonel. Elsewhere in
the region, the ripple of change has been quieter but no less significant in
lighting the freshly trodden avenue of freedom.
Saudi Arabia's round of elections this year and its promise that women will be
able to take part next time, is a fascinating revolution of historic proportion,
especially for a state in charge of the holiest of shrines, not only for its
muslim subjects, but for millions of Muslims of many nations.
A Vatican `fatwa' in February condemned democracy as heresy, sinful like
contraceptives and divorce, but tolerated as `a necessary evil,' less harmful
than the alternatives. A man of the cloth will never accept an alternative to `
God's law', albeit modern democracies long separation between state and the
church. Ever since its condemnation of Galileo for his sinful discovery that it
was earth that circled the sun, not the other way round, the religious
institution, regardless of the faith it upholds, sees itself as the centre of
the universe. Given the fact that the religious institution lends legitimacy to
the Saudi government, in a tribal society that has little time for individual's
rights, one can realise the gigantic revolutionary significance of Saudi
citizens' rush for last month's elections.
In Egypt, no demonstrations passed peacefully since the 1952 military coup ,
except those organised by Colonel Nasser's one party ` Socialist Union,' SU;
others were brutally crushed by police. The yellow placard ` enough' movement
demonstration in February, was protected, instead of being prevented, by the
police. President Hosni Mubarak stunned his, ruling National Party NP- the
legacy of SU- by petitioning Parliament to change presidential election rules to
allow multi-candidate elections, just 24 hours after NP leaders dismissed the
Enough Movement demands as ` unconstitutional.'
As the Syrian backed Lebanese government resigned, president Bashar Assad of
Syria told Time magazine, he will concede to the Lebanese demands to pull troops
out of Lebanon, which he announced in speech to parliament March 5. There was
even a reform rally held by some 100 people held a protest to mark 42 years
since the imposition of emergency laws, which is new to one of few Stalinist
style states left; even though they were chased away were chased away by
Baathist marchers wielding placards and sticks, but hey were not arrested.
The ripples of change in the region is also indicating that 2005 Middle
Easterners are as qualified as their 1989 European brothers and sisters in
making the democratic revolution. Human inclination to freedom makes democracy
possible, but human inclination to dominate, makes democracy a necessity.
Copyright © Adel Darwish &
Mideastnews and its parent company World Media UK Limited 2005. All rights
reserved. No part of this site may be reproduced or transmitted in any
form by any means or used for any business purpose without the written
consent of the publisher. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that
the information contained herein is as accurate as possible, the publisher
cannot accept responsibility for any consequences arising from its use.
Back to the top
Main
Page |