Dictatorship Without A Dictator
International attention has been focused on Syria and its
swinging between the old guard and the courageous but powerless new.
By Adel
Darwish in Damascus
It was the politics of marches, and public-rallies, and reaction to them that
focused observers' lenses last month on how Syria is swinging between the old
and the new.
A 100 reformists, including lawyers, writers and Kurds, demonstrated in protest
in Damascus, on March 10, to mark the 42nd anniversary of the imposition of
emergency laws. They were confronted in a city centre square by 300 marchers
wielding placards and sticks and guided by Ba'ath Party commissars. Ambulances
were called as many were beaten up, but the police, present in large number, did
not intervene. Instead, they confiscated the camera of a BBC news team, to the
fury of Syrian information minister, who intervened to recover it. As old habits
die hard, the minister, himself trying to modernies his department and the state
owned Syrian media, urged the BBC producer not to show the scenes when his
request to hand over the tape fell on deaf ears.
The organisers, National Co-ordination Committee for Basic Freedom and Human
Rights NCBFHR accused pro-government supporters of `` repressive and uncivilised
behaviour.'' Although government sources tried to present as two groups with
opposing views clashing, witness said they identified some of the pro-government
organisers as leaders of the rally outside the parliament in Damascus during
President Bashar Assad's speech on Saturday March 5.
Mr Assad gave a long speech to Parliament in response to President George Bush's
demands that Syria fully comply with UN security council resolution 1559 and
pull all its troops out of Lebanon unconditionally.
The call came at the end of two weeks of
anti-Syrian rallies following the
assassination of pro-western former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, but
were dwarfed by the massive Hizbullah pro-Syrian display of force, on Mar 8.
Bare headed girls were more than a match in numbers to their veiled sisters, and
portraits of their ` Cedar martyr' Mr Hariri, competed in numbers with those of
President Assad and his late father Hafez, while the cedar Lebanese flags
outnumbered all three. Such display pulled the rug from underneath earlier
American claims that it was an orchestrated pro-Iran pro-Syria Hizbullah rally.
It also came at a time when Damascus, under a siege mentality with Syrians
pulling deposits out of American and Lebanese banks, was desperately trying to
regain the initiatives at the end of two weeks of immense American lead
pressure.
Next day, a massive rally in Support of President Assad and denouncing
resolution 1559, was organised by `` the public sector,'' and it was `` not a
normal demonstration,'' in the words of a Syrian official, ie ` we didn't
organise it ourselves pal,'. Tens of thousands were rallied by text messages,
curtsy the largest private mobile operator Syria-tel, which, coincidentally,
owned by the President's cousin,, just to back the officials claim of its
independence.
They carried portraits of President Assad and his late father Hafez, and many of
Colonel Gamal Abdel-Nasser, the late autocratic ruler of Egypt, where his
portrait is no longer a rallying point for nationalists.
It was evident, how the old guard of the ruling Ba'ath party is still trapped in
a time warp, and keeping many aspects of the country very much the old soviet
style of bureaucracy, mismanagement, inefficiency and censorship, while keeping
the public busy with slogans about gigantic tasks.
Ask any Syrian official and he will say troops are leaving Lebanon; press them
on the question of Lebanon's national sovereignty and you get some meaningless
slogans. Will the two nations exchange ambassadors and open embassies in each
other's capitals?
`` We are not two nations, we are one nation,'' replied Buthaina Shaaban,
Minister for Syrian migrants and a close associate of President Assad, but also
a hardline Baathist.
Her remark highlights the contradictions within Syrian ruling elite.
Soon after he became president in 2000, the 39 year old once British trained
ophthalmologist, let it be known he wanted to modernise and reform, which
encouraged liberal minded reformists who, until then, either kept their heads
low, or ruthlessly suppressed by his father who ruled Syria with an Iron grip.
Under the father's rule the regime was text-book totalitarian police state, akin
to Saddam Hussein's Iraq. But in the last few years, Damascus began to become
more of a Beirut and less of a Baghdad.
Today the picture is different, but confusing. Tastefully decorated nightclubs,
western style cafes and restaurants serving fine Lebanese, French and Italian
win are frequented by Syrians dancing the night away with large screens play the
latest Lebanese and Egyptian pop videos. A jungle of satellite dishes covers
Damascus roofs as people get their news directly from Lebanese satellite TVA or
the Internet, ignoring the dreary state owned newspapers.
Local Journalists say the margin of freedom has got broader: `` we now pay fines
instead of going to jail for reporting the wrong story.''
Try reading a newspaper, speaking to frustrated reformists or any service from
banking, to hotels to the Syrian airlines, and it is flashback to the Soviet
Union days - the plane was still a few feet above the runway when a dozen
passengers were up collecting their hand-luggage, while the crew were no were to
be seen.
Western diplomats agree that the old guard, who changed party rules and
constitution to let Bashar inherit the presidency, are holding him to ransom.
People smoking ` argilh' on the cafes draw unfavourable comparisons between
Bashar Assad and his father, Hafez.
They feel freer now, the say, but the father was stronger and wiser. While Hafez
was assiduously courted by the West, even at times when they knew the mess they
were hiring him to clear was partly his own.
Bashar finds himself in catch 22 with the old guard stopping him modernising,
which is steadily losing him friends whom he needs to reform and check the old
guard. French President Jacques Chirac, who backed Bashar and promoted him in
Europe , grew frustrated with fee-dragging over reform and was anger by an 800 M
dollar gas contract slipping from the fingers of Total; He joined Washington to
sponsor resolution 1559. Tony Blair, who took the risk of inviting Bashar for a
state visit in 2002, has forsaken him.
Even Egypt and Saudi Arabia joined the chorus calling for Syrian troops to leave
Lebanon .
This is in contrast to his father's foreign policy of turning a crisis into an
opportunity. He might have followed his fathers track of radical Arab
nationalism in Foreign policy, but he lacked the father's cunning. The father
kept ideology for internal consumption or to raise his profile in the populist
competition with Saddam Hussein, agisnt whom he sent troops to liberate Kuwait
in 1991 and in exchanged for exiling Lebanese nationalist ledear Gn Michel Aoun
and a free hand in Lebanon. Bashar, in contrast, denounced the war that toppled
Saddam and is accused by the Americans of harbouring some of the insurgency
leaders, while allowing foreign fighters to cross the borders into Iraq.
``Bashar is trying to bargain after the crisis, '' said an Iraqi academic exiled
in Damascus, `` Hafez would bargain to snatch the deal in advance of the crisis
and avoid it.''
The Ba'athist ideology is also preventing Bashar from exploiting his good deeds
with the Americans. In February, they handed over Saddam's half-brother, Sabawai
Ibrahim who was masterminding the network of the insurgency to the Iraqi
government, yet Damascus kept quiet about it despite accusing Sabawai of
entering Syria illegally and killing Syrians in the 1980s. `` why didn't you
charge him before a judge and hand him over publicly and gain world's
admiration?''
They didn't want to alienate Arab nationalist opinion, they said.
Few believe that the President is really calling the shots, many believe that
his father's Baathist old guard are pulling his strings.
`` This is a dictatorship without a dictator,'' western diplomats say.
Bashar's friends from the days when he ran the Syrian Computer Society - and
shocked his father's cabinet in 1998 by promoting the Internet cafes and
expanding service providers against the advice of the powerful intelligence
service, say he is a modernist and reformist but powerless against the old
guard.
Several Syrian academic and businessmen, claim they have advised Bashar to take
Colonel Gaddafi's rather than Saddam's rout. By giving up his nuclear programme,
Gaddafi has quickly changed from Reagan's ``mad dog'' into a friend of the West
- and nobody is asking him to become a democrat.
The young Assad, it seems, is aware of his fix. He gave an interview to an
American reporter from Time Magazine, and told him as he was leaving : ``I am
not Saddam Hussein, I want to do-operate.''. Pulling out of his troops from
Lebanon, once unthinkable, could be the start of a series of reforms, both in
foreign and domestic policies. But it could also be used to block them with by
saying ` we have made enough concessions in one day, let us hold into the
bastion of Arab nationalism.'
The regime will find it hard to distract America by offering small steps and
concessions here and there, said one Damascus businessman, on Bashar's side,
what we need is bold steps.
Syrian intelligence could help, as they did in two occasions according to the
Americans, do-operate in the war against terrorism, make peace with the
Palestinian legitimate authority instead of supporting the hardliners and
harbouring Mahmoud Abbas's dangerous opponents and do more to round up
insurgency leaders.
Western diplomats agree, but warn that change of policy could endanger his power
base or his life; however, with Syria now is in President Bush's target finder,
the alternative is worse if the regime doesn't change its ways since what
America want is the regime to change its ways, not a regime change.
Copyright © Adel Darwish &
Mideastnews and its parent company World Media UK Limited 2005. All rights
reserved. No part of this site may be reproduced or transmitted in any
form by any means or used for any business purpose without the written
consent of the publisher. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that
the information contained herein is as accurate as possible, the publisher
cannot accept responsibility for any consequences arising from its use.
Back to the top
Main
Page
|